Performance comparison between Postgres and Greenplum - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Suvankar Roy
Subject Performance comparison between Postgres and Greenplum
Date
Msg-id OF2EBBDB72.9891A893-ON652575F2.0037D572-652575F2.003E5221@tcs.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Performance comparison between Postgres and Greenplum  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Re: Performance comparison between Postgres and Greenplum  (Alex Goncharov <alex-goncharov@comcast.net>)
Re: Performance comparison between Postgres and Greenplum  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
List pgsql-performance

Hi,

I have some 99,000 records in a table (OBSERVATION_ALL) in a Postgres DB as well as a Greenplum DB.

The Primary key is a composite one comprising of 2 columns (so_no, serial_no).

The execution of the following query takes 8214.016 ms in Greenplum but only 729.134 ms in Postgres.
select * from observation_all order by so_no, serial_no;

I believe that execution time in greenplum should be less compared to postgres. Can anybody throw some light, it would be of great help.


Regards,

Suvankar Roy

=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain 
confidential or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the 
information contained in this e-mail message 
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and 
immediately and permanently delete the message 
and any attachments. Thank you


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alex
Date:
Subject: Poor query performance
Next
From: Wayne Conrad
Date:
Subject: Poor overall performance unless regular VACUUM FULL