On Tue, 02 Aug 2022 at 11:06, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 10:42 PM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, 01 Aug 2022 at 22:16, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> > John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> >> You are correct, but I wonder if it'd be better to just drop the comment
>> >> entirely. I checked a couple other random headers with function
>> >> declarations and they didn't have such a comment, and it's kind of
>> obvious
>> >> what they're for.
>> >
>> > Some places have these, some don't. It's probably more useful where
>> > a header foo.h is declaring functions that aren't in the obviously
>> > corresponding foo.c file, or live in multiple files. In this case
>> > I agree it's not adding much.
>> >
>>
>> Attached patch to remove this comment. Please take a look.
>
>
> I'm not sure that we should remove such comments. And a rough search
> shows that there are much more places with this kind of comments, such
> as below:
>
> nbtxlog transam readfuncs walreceiver buffile bufmgr fd latch pmsignal
> procsignal sinvaladt logtape rangetypes
>
Thanks for your review! Here, I think we are only talking about catalog headers.
--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.
