RE: PostgreSQL Full Vacuum Taking 5 to 6 hrs. - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Ram Pratap Maurya
Subject RE: PostgreSQL Full Vacuum Taking 5 to 6 hrs.
Date
Msg-id KL1PR0601MB4433DF7D763944C202847F8CF02D9@KL1PR0601MB4433.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: PostgreSQL Full Vacuum Taking 5 to 6 hrs.  (Ram Pratap Maurya <ram.maurya@lavainternational.in>)
List pgsql-admin
HI Julien,

In my current database index size is very large compare than table (if table size is 30 GB and index size is 90GB) ,
thatwhy We running full vacuum monthly basis to increase the system performance and data reclaim . 
Auto Vacuum is also configuration in system.
" maintenance_work_mem " paramater size to 2GB configure in system.


System configuration as below:

CPU - 42
RAM -70GB



Regards,
Ram Pratap.

-----Original Message-----
From: Julien Rouhaud [mailto:rjuju123@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 February 2022 12:38
To: Ram Pratap Maurya
Cc: 'pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org'; Ashish Chugh
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Full Vacuum Taking 5 to 6 hrs.

Hi,

Please don't top post on those forums
(https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists#Email_etiquette_mechanics)

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:59:07AM +0000, Ram Pratap Maurya wrote:
>
> we are running VACUUM FULL on all table and its take 5 to 6 Hrs.

The only thing that can be done to make it faster is to use a 1GB maintenance_work_mem.

But why do you need to do frequent database wide VACUUM FULL in the first place?  Do you really have massive bloat on
everysingle table in the database? 

Do you have adequate autovacuum configuration, or additional VACUUM jobs if that's not enough?



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Ram Pratap Maurya
Date:
Subject: RE: PostgreSQL Full Vacuum Taking 5 to 6 hrs.
Next
From: Ram Pratap Maurya
Date:
Subject: RE: PostgreSQL Full Vacuum Taking 5 to 6 hrs.