Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From gkokolatos@pm.me
Subject Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression
Date
Msg-id J4hpev8z-ElCT_rFLwiDypcSk3fgq9llb0FbEzH74eg7YPVQPSn4KaAi_Rd63ndvY8Bcv-zoo0VOZbfCZSRfOobRazlCLuOl8S7pUC1mRlE=@pm.me
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression  (gkokolatos@pm.me)
List pgsql-hackers

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Friday, July 2nd, 2021 at 03:10, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 02:10:17PM +0000, gkokolatos@pm.me wrote:
>
> > Micheal suggested on the same thread to move my entry in the help output so that
> >
> > the output remains ordered. I would like the options for the compression method and
> >
> > the already existing compression level to next to each other if possible. Then it
> >
> > should be either 'X' or 'Y'.
>
> Hmm. Grouping these together makes sense for the user. One choice
>
> that we have here is to drop the short option, and just use a long
>
> one. What I think is important for the user when it comes to this
>
> option is the consistency of its naming across all the tools
>
> supporting it. pg_dump and pg_basebackup, where we could plug LZ4,
>
> already use most of the short options you could use for pg_receivewal,
>
> having only a long one gives a bit more flexibility.


Good point. I am going with that one.


>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Next
From: Ronan Dunklau
Date:
Subject: Re: Add proper planner support for ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates