pg_stat_reset() weirdness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject pg_stat_reset() weirdness
Date
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOMEJNCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness
List pgsql-hackers
Hi guys,

If you apply the pg_stat_reset() function patch you get this regression
failure.  Is this because it's returning a bool I guess?  Shall I just fix
the regression test to exclude this function?

Chris

*** ./expected/opr_sanity.out   Fri Jul 19 07:11:32 2002
--- ./results/opr_sanity.out    Fri Aug  9 13:26:00 2002
***************
*** 27,34 ****       AND p1.proname !~ 'costestimate$'       AND p1.proname != 'update_pg_pwd_and_pg_group';  oid |
proname
! -----+---------
! (0 rows)
 -- Look for conflicting proc definitions (same names and input datatypes). -- (This test should be dead code now that
wehave the unique index
 
--- 27,35 ----       AND p1.proname !~ 'costestimate$'       AND p1.proname != 'update_pg_pwd_and_pg_group';  oid  |
proname
! ------+---------------
!  2249 | pg_stat_reset
! (1 row)
 -- Look for conflicting proc definitions (same names and input datatypes). -- (This test should be dead code now that
wehave the unique index
 

======================================================================



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS
Next
From: Oliver Elphick
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Linux Largefile Support In Postgresql RPMS