Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness
Date
Msg-id 446.1028901013@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_stat_reset() weirdness  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> If you apply the pg_stat_reset() function patch you get this regression
> failure.  Is this because it's returning a bool I guess?  Shall I just fix
> the regression test to exclude this function?

No, you should fix the function definition.  The sanity checks are there
for a reason.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Lyons
Date:
Subject: OOP real life example (was Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CREATE TEMP TABLE .... ON COMMIT