On Jul 10, 2006, at 1:33 PM, Karen Hill wrote:
> Is the difficulty of creating a telephone type the reason it is not in
> postgresql already?
>
> Should the telephone type be able to do something such as:
>
> SELECT * from tableFOO where telephone.areacode = 555;
>
> Or would regex be better?
makes more sense to store them in a a canonical format and then find
things with pattern matches.
