Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Imseih (AWS), Sami
Subject Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Date
Msg-id FA77DBA0-B42B-43F5-8406-E7069614CAB3@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum  ("Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>    I took a look at the latest patch set.

>    +      <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition">
>    +       <structfield>indexes_total</structfield> <type>bigint</type>
>    +      </para>
>    +      <para>
>    +       The number of indexes to be processed in the
>    +       <literal>vacuuming indexes</literal>
>    +       or <literal>cleaning up indexes</literal> phase. It is set to
>    +       <literal>0</literal> when vacuum is not in any of these phases.
>    +      </para></entry>

>    Could we avoid resetting it to 0 unless INDEX_CLEANUP was turned off or
>    failsafe kicked in?  It might be nice to know how many indexes the vacuum
>    intends to process.  I don't feel too strongly about this, so if it would
>    add a lot of complexity, it might be okay as is.

Your suggestion is valid. On INDEX_CLEANUP it is set to 0 from the start and when failsafe kicks in it will be reset to
0.I Will remove the reset call for the common index vacuum path. 
 

 >           BTreeShmemInit();
 >           SyncScanShmemInit();
 >           AsyncShmemInit();
 >   +       vacuum_worker_init();

 >   Don't we also need to add the size of the hash table to
 >   CalculateShmemSize()?

No, ShmemInitHash takes the min and max size of the hash and in turn calls ShmemInitStruct to setup the shared memory.

>    + * A command type can optionally define a callback function
>    + * which will derive Datum values rather than use values
>    + * directly from the backends progress array.

>    I think this can be removed.

Good catch.

--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Next
From: "Imseih (AWS), Sami"
Date:
Subject: Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum