> On 2 May 2023, at 16:02, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Since that's stood for a few decades now, changing it seems impossible
> from the backwards-compatibility standpoint.
Agreed, that's a non-starter.
> However, it does seem
> appropriate to repeat that material in the wrapper's documentation.
>
> I wonder whether the similar plperl and pltcl wrappers are also
> documentation-shy here.
It seems like they are all a bit thin on explaining this. The attached diff
copies the wording (which unsurprisingly is pretty good IMO) into the
plperl/python/tcl documentation.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
