Re: JDBC, prepared queries, and partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Stephen Denne
Subject Re: JDBC, prepared queries, and partitioning
Date
Msg-id F0238EBA67824444BC1CB4700960CB4804A4F69D@dmpeints002.isotach.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JDBC, prepared queries, and partitioning  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Simon Riggs wrote
> On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 10:45 +1300, Stephen Denne wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote
> > > ISTM we need a way to say "this query's parameters vary wildly at
> > > execution time, so I really need to re-plan it every time".
> >
> > If the wild variations don't affect the cost estimate, they
> won't affect the plan?
>
> Cost estimates are made at planning time. If you don't
> replan, no, they
> won't.

What I meant was that for some queries, replanning with wildly different parameter values will always select the same
plan.
That'd happen if the distribution from which the parameter value is chosen was flat, and the operation involving the
parameterdoesn't affect selectivity (eg "equals" rather than "greater than"). 
Though I guess in that case that it isn't possible to have a "wildly" different value.

Stephen Denne.

Disclaimer:
At the Datamail Group we value team commitment, respect, achievement, customer focus, and courage. This email with any
attachmentsis confidential and may be subject to legal privilege.  If it is not intended for you please advise by reply
immediately,destroy it and do not copy, disclose or use it in any way. 

__________________________________________________________________
  This email has been scanned by the DMZGlobal Business Quality
              Electronic Messaging Suite.
Please see http://www.dmzglobal.com/services/bqem.htm for details.
__________________________________________________________________



pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC, prepared queries, and partitioning
Next
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC, prepared queries, and partitioning