RE: Big 7.1 open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject RE: Big 7.1 open items
Date
Msg-id EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJEEAKCCAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Big 7.1 open items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Big 7.1 open items  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
> > 
> > So why all the enthusiasm for multi-tables-per-file?
> 
> No idea.  I thought Vadim mentioned it, but I am not sure anymore.  I
> certainly like our current system.
> 

Oops,I'm not so enthusiastic for multi_tables_per_file smgr.
I believe that Ross and I have taken a practical way that doesn't
break current file_per_table smgr.

However it seems very natural to take multi_tables_per_file
smgr into account when we consider TABLESPACE concept.
Because TABLESPACE is an encapsulation,it should have
a possibility to handle multi_tables_per_file smgr IMHO.

Regards. 

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue@tpf.co.jp 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Date:
Subject: RE: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename
Next
From: darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Date:
Subject: Re: Changes to functions and triggers