Re: Big 7.1 open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date
Msg-id 18821.961258278@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Big 7.1 open items  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> However it seems very natural to take multi_tables_per_file
> smgr into account when we consider TABLESPACE concept.
> Because TABLESPACE is an encapsulation,it should have
> a possibility to handle multi_tables_per_file smgr IMHO.

OK, I see: you're just saying that the tablespace stuff should be
designed in such a way that it would work with a non-file-per-table
smgr.  Agreed, that'd be a good check of a clean design, and someday
we might need it...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kaare Rasmussen
Date:
Subject: RE: Big 7.1 open items
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename