> On 4 Apr 2023, at 20:36, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 11:18, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>
>>> * clean up permission checks after 599b33b94
>>
>> I believe that the actual bug fixes are in, and what's left is just a test
>> case that people weren't very excited about adding. So maybe this should
>> get closed out as committed.
>
> I'm not super convinced about this one. I'm not a big "all tests are
> good tests" believer but this test seems like a pretty reasonable one.
> Permissions checks and user mappings are user-visible behaviour that
> are easy to overlook when making changes with unexpected side effects.
>
> It seems like the test would be just as easy to commit as to not
> commit and I don't see anything tricky about it that would necessitate
> a more in depth review.
Agreed, I think this test has value and don't see a strong reason not to commit
it.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
