> On 7 Sep 2021, at 13:36, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On 12.08.21 04:52, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 5:42 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11 Aug 2021, at 09:57, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Additionally, refresh options as described in
>>>> <replaceable>refresh_option</replaceable> of
>>>> <literal>REFRESH PUBLICATION</literal> may be specified,
>>>> except in the case of <literal>DROP PUBLICATION</literal>.
>>>
>>> Since this paragraph is under the literal option “refresh”, which takes a
>>> value, I still find your original patch to be the clearest.
>> Yeah, I prefer my original patch over this idea. On the other hand, I
>> can see the point of review comment on it that Amit pointed out[1].
>
> How about this:
>
> - Additionally, refresh options as described
> - under <literal>REFRESH PUBLICATION</literal> may be specified.
> + Additionally, the options described under <literal>REFRESH
> + PUBLICATION</literal> may be specified, to control the implicit refresh
> + operation.
LGTM.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
