Re: Next development steps? - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Next development steps?
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E9B1@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Next development steps?  (Ludek Finstrle <luf@pzkagis.cz>)
Responses Re: Next development steps?  (Ludek Finstrle <luf@pzkagis.cz>)
Re: Next development steps?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
List pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Ludek Finstrle
> Sent: 14 December 2005 14:39
> To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> Subject: [ODBC] Next development steps?
>
> Hello,
>
>   I study the driver and there are lot of code which doesn't
> work since
> libpq support. (e.g.) There is support for updatable cursor
> which doesn't
> work (if I'm right) because it's using backend_tuples which isn't
> supported.
>
>   It seems no other (except swamped Dave and Anoop) is supporting ODBC
> driver. I propose these steps:
>
> 1) clean the code (and UI) with drop all non-trivial features
>    - these features make the code unreadable and complicated with
>      no proper behaviour right now
>    - there is no error report for them since libpq support
>      (exclude [#1000413] Optimistic lock cannot be used with
> updateable
>       cursors - I think updateable cursor doesn't work at all)

What features do you have in mind?

> 2) create better transaction support (see Marco Ristola post)
>    - http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2005-03/msg00128.php
>    - http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2005-03/msg00116.php

OK.

> 3) improve libpq support to use PQprepare, bind parameters

Yes. Actually I wonder why we don't get rid of the server side prepare
option and always do that (using PQprepare).

> 4) full support for only_forward read-only cursor

OK.

> 5) create small steps in support dropped things
> and so on ...
>
> Can we create a new development branch at least?

I'm more inclined to create a stable branch and develop in tip.

Can I also assume you expect to be around for a good while to work on
this ambitious plan? ODBC developers are few and far between, so
starting a major project can be quite a commitment for all of us.

Regards, Dave.

pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000414 ] file based dns does not connect
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: More strict bind param count checking