-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org on behalf of Greg Sabino Mullane
Sent: Sat 9/4/2004 8:57 PM
To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Suggestion for improving Archives
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> the followign was searching "nested transaction support":
>
> "Documents 1-10 of total 383 found. Searching in 390035 documents took
> 4.714 seconds."
> The self-reported time should really not be used. I just ran a query, for
> example, that took 8 seconds as measured by my local clock, but reported
> searching in under 2 seconds: so obviously there are some other factors
> here. (I'll give maybe half a second for network times on my end).
Factors that would apply equally if we used pgsql.ru - what you are most likely seeing it the ads and other graphics
loading.If we used pgsql.ru, you would still have those coming from hub.org.
> pgsql.ru: very fast, searches all sites at once, no advertisements,
> nice "group by site" feature, cool Mozilla plugin, BSD-licensed tech,
> written by PG developers
Would be linked from main site with ads if we started using it 'officially'.
> search.postgresql.org: linked from main site?
Yes, should we leave it hidden? :-) Note that in comparison to pgsql.ru, search.pg.org also groups by site, searches
allsites at once and is seriously hacked by PG developers (not written I grant you). It is also open source (GPL, not
BSD- not that I think that is particularly important to any of the users).
Regards, Dave.
