On Friday 03 September 2004 03:18, Dave Page wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> > Sent: 03 September 2004 00:57
> > To: Tom Lane
> > Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ; PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Comment forms in interactive docs
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org> writes:
> > >> There are comments forms interactive docs. I think we
> >
> > should remove them.
> >
> > >> Who follows the user comments in there? I'm sure, noone!
> > >
> > > Actually, we've made a practice of scavenging for useful
> >
> > comments at
> >
> > > least once a release cycle. There's a lot of crud in
> >
> > there, I agree,
> >
> > > but some good ideas about missing material too. Anyway,
> >
> > what is your
> >
> > > idea of "interactive" docs if not ones that people can comment on?
> >
> > I know that I tend to make extensive use of the user
> > 'comments' when I'm looking at similar in the PHP docs ...
> > you usually get some valuable examples that the docs are
> > seriously lacking ...
>
> Very true, the php idocs are excellent. The question is, how do we
> encourage submissions of the same quality, without all the 'Where can I
> get pdf docs' and 'why doesn't my C program work' questions?
>
I believe one significant difference is the php doc submissions are moderated,
and therefore subject to less cruft. I've suggested in the past that doc
submissions get posted to -www or -doc, but neither group seemed interested
in supporting that.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
