pgsql: Fix inappropriate uses of PG_GETARG_UINT32() - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject pgsql: Fix inappropriate uses of PG_GETARG_UINT32()
Date
Msg-id E1muDOZ-0005QX-Uc@gemulon.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-committers
Fix inappropriate uses of PG_GETARG_UINT32()

The chr() function used PG_GETARG_UINT32() even though the argument is
declared as (signed) integer.  As a result, you can pass negative
arguments to this function and it internally interprets them as
positive.  Ultimately ends up being harmless, but it seems wrong, so
fix this and rearrange the internal error checking a bit to
accommodate this.

Another case was in the documentation, where example code used
PG_GETARG_UINT32() with an argument declared as signed integer.

Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <bossartn@amazon.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/7e43869b-d412-8f81-30a3-809783edc9a3%40enterprisedb.com

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/e9e63b7022ddd0aaaae7cd439daa234cf9e6a21c

Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/xfunc.sgml               |  2 +-
src/backend/utils/adt/oracle_compat.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Silence perl complaint in ssl test
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Rethink pg_dump's handling of object ACLs.