On Aug 31, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> In any case, there is plenty of precedent for hard-coding knowledge about
> specific version updates into pg_upgrade. The question here is whether
> it's feasible to handle extensions that way. I think we could reasonably
> expect to know about cases where a formerly separate extension got
> integrated into core,
+1
> but are there other cases where pg_upgrade would
> need to ignore an extension in the old database?
Not that I can think of, unless it’s already present because it was in template1 or something.
David
