Thanks for the reply.
> Thanks for reporting. I think for LogicalParallelApplyStateChange we'd better document it in a consistent style with
LogicalSyncStateChange,
> so I have slightly adjusted the patch for the same.
I think the description in the patch you attached is better.
Regards,
Noriyoshi Shinoda
-----Original Message-----
From: houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2023 7:15 PM
To: Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP) <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com>; Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>; wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com; Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>;
shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com;PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>; Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
On Monday, January 9, 2023 5:32 PM Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP) <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Thanks for the great new feature.
>
> Applied patches include adding wait events LogicalParallelApplyMain,
> LogicalParallelApplyStateChange.
> However, it seems that monitoring.sgml only contains descriptions for
> pg_locks. The attached patch adds relevant wait event information.
> Please update if you have a better description.
Thanks for reporting. I think for LogicalParallelApplyStateChange we'd better document it in a consistent style with
LogicalSyncStateChange,so I have slightly adjusted the patch for the same.
Best regards,
Hou zj
