Re: data checksums - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: data checksums
Date
Msg-id DDF016B5-F5CD-4143-A2C7-89BDE6F61FBE@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: data checksums  (Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>)
Responses Re: data checksums
List pgsql-general
> On 6 Aug 2024, at 18:29, Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com> wrote:
>> On Aug 6, 2024, at 08:11, bruno vieira da silva <brunogiovs@gmail.com> wrote:

>> the pg doc
>> mentions a considerable performance penality, how considerable it is?
>
> That line is probably somewhat out of date at this point.  We haven't seen a significant slowdown in enabling them on
anymodern hardware.  I always turn them on, except on the type of filesystems/hardware mentioned above. 

The last in-depth analysis of data checksums (and hint bits) overhead that I
can remember is from 2019:

  https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190330192543.GH4719%40development

Hardware advances in the last five years may very well have made these findings
irrelevant however.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michael Harris
Date:
Subject: Re: ANALYZE on partitioned tables vs on individual partitions
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: ANALYZE on partitioned tables vs on individual partitions