Agreed. Opting in to each specific feature wouldn’t be the cleanest but it would mean sticking with a single protocol.
Itwould also mean that existing clients would continue work without modification for the foreseeable future.
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Well we would be adding messages that current protocol handlers may not know how to deal with which will likely
requirethem to rewrite their code
>
> Not sure if backend developers would be happy to support multiple
> protocols at the same time.
> opt-in approach with "facelifted messages" seems more plausible.
> Vladimir
