Re: Backend protocol wanted features - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Backend protocol wanted features
Date
Msg-id CADK3HH+_F0bB1XzAjTmCJa-tX6W8iC=rdnv-Je=CjaZ9Kt5SEA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Backend protocol wanted features  (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
I did float this balloon and the response was "there will be a fairly high bar to adoption". Not that that should stop this effort. Just sayin'


On 29 December 2015 at 16:47, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com> wrote:
>Well we would be adding messages that current protocol handlers may not know how to deal with which will likely require them to rewrite their code

Not sure if backend developers would be happy to support multiple
protocols at the same time.
opt-in approach with "facelifted messages" seems more plausible.
Vladimir

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Wooten
Date:
Subject: Re: Backend protocol wanted features
Next
From: John Harvey
Date:
Subject: Are pgrpm changes for JDBC discussed here before submission?