Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 11/01/2011 09:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm for just redefining the query field as "current or last
>> query".
>
> +1
>
>> I could go either way on whether to rename it.
>
> Rename it please. "current_query" will just be wrong. I'd be inclined
> just to call it "query" or "query_string" and leave it to the docs to
> define the exact semantics.
+1 for renaming, +1 for a state column.
I think it is overkill to keep a query history beyond that -- if you
want that,
you can resort to the log files.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
