Reuven M. Lerner wrote:
> When a record in the main table is deleted, there is a rule (yes a rule -- not a trigger) in the
> referencing table that performs a lo_unlink on the associated object.
> I just want to check that my intuition is correct: Wouldn't it be way faster and more efficient
> for us to use BYTEA columns to store the data (which can get into the 20-50 MB range),
> and for us to just depend on ON DELETE CASCADE, rather than a rule?
[followed by dramatic performance numbers]
Could you try with a trigger instead of a rule and see if the performance is better?
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
