Re: need information - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: need information
Date
Msg-id D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C202FF6574@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: need information  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: need information  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-general
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Question 1 is wrong, because Npgsql is no commercial .NET data provider.
>> That's the main advantage: it is open source.
>
> This is actually a misconception. Open Source doesn't disqualify it as
> commercial. It disqualifies it as proprietary. I can make money
> providing consulting for Npgsql, that makes it commercial or at least
> the opportunity for it to be commercial.
>
> Not to be pedantic but let's be accurate with our data. We are database
> people after all :)

Thank you for the correction.

Although I'd say that the fact that you can make money by consulting
for something does not make it commercial software. Maybe I'm wrong.

But it is of course possible to forbid people to use your open source
software unless they pay for it, which would make it commercial
in my eyes.

This is getting off topic, sorry.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michal Politowski
Date:
Subject: Re: (P)SQL for a sum with constraints
Next
From: Raymond O'Donnell
Date:
Subject: Re: PgAdmin & PosgreSQL Plus Setup