Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Dann Corbit |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) |
Date | |
Msg-id | D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B8294CE1C9@voyager.corporate.connx.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) ("John Wells" <jb@devsea.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
(Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb@eskimo.com>)
|
List | pgsql-general |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Oliver Elphick [mailto:olly@lfix.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:10 PM > To: Vivek Khera > Cc: PostgreSQL general list > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) > > > On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 20:28, Vivek Khera wrote: > > >>>>> "OE" == Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk> writes: > > > > OE> But as far as Debian is concerned, paragraph 1 applies: > > > > OE> 1. Free use for those who are 100% GPL > > > > [[ ... ]] > > > > OE> That makes it free under the Debian Free Software > Guidelines, so I > > OE> have no grounds for requesting its removal. :-( > > > > So if I build and sell an appliance (hardware+software) based on > > debian and using the 'free' collection of software, > suddenly I'm not > > in compliance with their license. Sounds like a time-bomb > waiting to > > explode. > > It's licensed under the GPL, which means that you can indeed > sell it, SO LONG AS you make your own source code available > to your customer under the GPL or a compatible licence. > Nothing in the GPL stops you demanding money for the > software; what it requires is that you make your source code > available. Then who's going to pay for it? > It's whole purpose is to force the freeing of > source code; it is not much concerned with money. For > example, I remember years ago installing a DG Aviion > operating system upgrade, where I found that the compiler was > gcc, with the GPL prominently attached. And every > embedded-Linux device is in the same situation. > > MySQL's licence does not require you to buy a licence for > _any_ commercial use, but only for commercial use where you > do not release your source code under a GPL-compatible licence. > > There seems to be an awful lot of confusion about the GPL. > Maybe Microsoft's campaign has been bearing fruit in unlikely > quarters... The reason that there is a lot of confusion is that the license conditions are extremely confusing. > -- > Oliver Elphick > Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk > Isle of Wight, UK > http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver > GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 > E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C > ======================================== > "Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of > God; for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither > tempteth he any man; But every man is tempted, when he > is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed." > James 1:13,14 > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index > scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match >
pgsql-general by date: