Re: index_delete_sort: Unnecessary variable "low" is used in heapam.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: index_delete_sort: Unnecessary variable "low" is used in heapam.c
Date
Msg-id D5B5B226-1EA5-4831-ACF2-919F14CE27AA@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: index_delete_sort: Unnecessary variable "low" is used in heapam.c  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: index_delete_sort: Unnecessary variable "low" is used in heapam.c
List pgsql-hackers
> On 5 Nov 2024, at 17:40, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>
> On 2024/09/24 21:31, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 24 Sep 2024, at 10:32, btnakamurakoukil <btnakamurakoukil@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>>> I noticed unnecessary variable "low" in index_delete_sort() (/postgres/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c), patch
attached.What do you think? 
>> That variable does indeed seem to not be used, and hasn't been used since it
>> was committed in d168b666823.  The question is if it's a left-over from
>> development which can be removed, or if it should be set and we're missing an
>> optimization.  Having not read the referenced paper I can't tell so adding
>> Peter Geoghegan who wrote this for clarification.
>
> It's been about a month without updates. How about removing the unnecessary
> variable as suggested? We can always add the "missing" logic later if needed.

Thanks for reviving this, I had admittedly forgotten about this thread.  I
don't see any reason to not go ahead with the proposed diff.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails
Next
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion