Re: pg_amcheck contrib application - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Dilger
Subject Re: pg_amcheck contrib application
Date
Msg-id D3828900-5183-4C67-8A13-8D58E54570AA@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_amcheck contrib application  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_amcheck contrib application  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

> On Apr 23, 2021, at 1:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Perhaps something like this, closer to the way you had it?
>
>       expected_size = chunk_seq < last_chunk_seq ? TOAST_MAX_CHUNK_SIZE
>               : extsize - (last_chunk_seq * TOAST_MAX_CHUNK_SIZE);

It still suffers the same failures.  I'll try to post something that accomplishes the changes to the reports that you
arelooking for. 

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: PageGetItemIdCareful - should we MAXALIGN sizeof(BTPageOpaqueData)?