> On Nov 19, 2021, at 1:44 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think we are saying the same thing. I intend to say that your 0003*
> patch closes the current gap in the code and we should consider
> applying it irrespective of what we do with respect to changing the
> ... OWNER TO .. behavior. Is there a reason why 0003* patch (or
> something on those lines) shouldn't be considered to be applied?
Jeff Davis and I had a long conversation off-list yesterday and reached the same conclusion. I will be submitting a
versionof 0003 which does not depend on the prior two patches.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
