Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdunCKv7Rg6wcj4A-kiXuBuAGn=oDbE6MnpFEhxh42EbTA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions
List pgsql-hackers
Hi, John!

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 6:44 AM John Naylor
<john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 3:23 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There are some places, which potentially could cause a slowdown.  I'm
> > going to make some experiments with that.
>
> I haven't looked at the patches, so I don't know of a specific place to look for a slowdown, but I thought it might
helpto perform the same query tests as my most recent test for evaluating qsort variants (some description in [1]), and
hereis the spreadsheet. Overall, the differences look like noise. A few cases with unabbreviatable text look a bit
fasterwith the patch. I'm not sure if that's a real difference, but in any case I don't see a slowdown anywhere. 
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFBsxsHeTACMP1JVQ%2Bm35-v2NkmEqsJMHLhEfWk4sTB5aw_jkQ%40mail.gmail.com

Great, thank you very much for the feedback!

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: postgres_fdw: Fix bug in checking of return value of PQsendQuery().
Next
From: Japin Li
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: Fix bug in checking of return value of PQsendQuery().