Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfduczcop9s6gKUpLGgFUe2y4ERGMJx6SS6Kp+s-kQPwMjg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to POC: make mxidoff 64 bits  (Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:30 PM Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is rebase.  Apparently I'll have to do it often, since the CATALOG_VERSION_NO changed in the patch.

I don't think you need to maintain CATALOG_VERSION_NO change in your
patch for the exact reason you have mentioned: patch will get conflict
each time CATALOG_VERSION_NO is advanced.  It's responsibility of
committer to advance CATALOG_VERSION_NO when needed.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hunaid Sohail
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add roman support for to_number function
Next
From: Jakub Wartak
Date:
Subject: Re: Set log_lock_waits=on by default