Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfducAP9Q1L0gG42ybMrvq2wvc60Lb8s8XebohNC151zCBw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 5:06 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2025-04-11 00:47:19 +0200, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 00:27, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 2025-03-09 14:13:52 +0200, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > > > I've revised commit message, comments, formatting etc.
> > > > I'm going to push this if no objections.
> > >
> > > I'm rather confused as to why this is a thing to push at this point? This
> > > doesn't seem to be a bugfix and it's post feature freeze.
> >
> > I think the patch from that mail got committed as 6bb6a62f about a
> > month ago, which was shortly after Alexander's message. Did you get
> > confused about the month of his message, or by the incorrect state of
> > the CF entry?
>
> Sorry for that Alexander - for some reason the email just showed up as new in
> my inbox and I only looked at the date, not the month :(

Not a problem at all!

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Large expressions in indexes can't be stored (non-TOASTable)
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: type cache cleanup improvements