Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses
Date
Msg-id dcgamu4gwdqgvtrbbghi5dnhch7d2bzohi6mf3md6usebtvgc3@ukubuvkjknfw
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2025-04-11 00:47:19 +0200, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 00:27, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2025-03-09 14:13:52 +0200, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > > I've revised commit message, comments, formatting etc.
> > > I'm going to push this if no objections.
> >
> > I'm rather confused as to why this is a thing to push at this point? This
> > doesn't seem to be a bugfix and it's post feature freeze.
> 
> I think the patch from that mail got committed as 6bb6a62f about a
> month ago, which was shortly after Alexander's message. Did you get
> confused about the month of his message, or by the incorrect state of
> the CF entry?

Sorry for that Alexander - for some reason the email just showed up as new in
my inbox and I only looked at the date, not the month :(

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Add connection active, idle time to pg_stat_activity
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring