Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthias van de Meent
Subject Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses
Date
Msg-id CAEze2WhkhADaTwGLPJLGnNuPTtwmDSxjJLAEDqUNZndpDMz_fg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 00:27, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2025-03-09 14:13:52 +0200, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > I've revised commit message, comments, formatting etc.
> > I'm going to push this if no objections.
>
> I'm rather confused as to why this is a thing to push at this point? This
> doesn't seem to be a bugfix and it's post feature freeze.

I think the patch from that mail got committed as 6bb6a62f about a
month ago, which was shortly after Alexander's message. Did you get
confused about the month of his message, or by the incorrect state of
the CF entry?


Kind regards,

Matthias van de Meent



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve a few appendStringInfo calls new to v18
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall