Re: Index range search optimization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Index range search optimization
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdtAcD1Y5WRgFjos5SuZZE7WJwGRhSWtZ3RW3_3aYXhy6g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Index range search optimization  (Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Index range search optimization
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:58 PM Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> wrote:
> One more doubt about naming. Calling function
> _bt_checkkeys(IndexScanDesc scan, IndexTuple tuple, int tupnatts,
> ScanDirection dir, bool *continuescan, bool requiredMatchedByPrecheck)
> as
> (void) _bt_checkkeys(scan, itup, indnatts, dir,
> &requiredMatchedByPrecheck, false);
> looks little bit misleading because of coincidence of names of 5 and 6
> arguments.

I've added the comment clarifying this argument usage.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: torikoshia
Date:
Subject: Re: Make --help output fit within 80 columns per line
Next
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extend ALTER OPERATOR to support adding commutator, negator, hashes, and merges