Re: Index range search optimization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Borisov
Subject Re: Index range search optimization
Date
Msg-id CALT9ZEF8uYxuR0GWhnOBWV-OwXXgZ=P6ynm5KVvA0ys_gR1_Bg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Index range search optimization  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Index range search optimization
Re: Index range search optimization
List pgsql-hackers
Hi, Alexander!

I found and fixed a couple of naming issues that came to v4 from
earlier patches.
Also, I added initialization of requiredMatchedByPrecheck in case of first page.

Please see patch v5.

One more doubt about naming. Calling function
_bt_checkkeys(IndexScanDesc scan, IndexTuple tuple, int tupnatts,
ScanDirection dir, bool *continuescan, bool requiredMatchedByPrecheck)
as
(void) _bt_checkkeys(scan, itup, indnatts, dir,
&requiredMatchedByPrecheck, false);
looks little bit misleading because of coincidence of names of 5 and 6
arguments.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrey Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?