Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdszzvY0rBRo5v_bxku0t+w9S9yV9SKHZd9_ceVsGASgSQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.  (Krunal Bauskar <krunalbauskar@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 6:58 AM Krunal Bauskar <krunalbauskar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let me know what do you think about this analysis and any specific direction that we should consider to help move
forward.

BTW, it would be also nice to benchmark my lwlock patch on the
Kunpeng.  I'm very optimistic about this patch, but it wouldn't be
fair to completely throw it away.  It still might be useful for
LSE-disabled builds.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: Better infrastructure for automated testing of concurrency issues
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Removal of operator_precedence_warning