Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdscbCP=GoGaYMQ29WAsSW4OmzFaKHwrzRGom6WMgw-Teg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:39 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> > Good.  The revised patch is attached.  Instead of adding argument to
> > LTREE_GET_ASIGLEN(), it introduces separate LTREE_GET_SIGLEN() and
> > LTREE_GET_ASIGLEN() macros.
>
> Um ... what I see after applying the patch is two redundant
> definitions of LTREE_GET_ASIGLEN, and no LTREE_GET_SIGLEN.

Sorry for publishing a patch, which doesn't even compile.
The attached version should be good.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Parameter for planner estimate of recursive queries
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers