Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13
Date
Msg-id 648115.1646926779@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> Good.  The revised patch is attached.  Instead of adding argument to
> LTREE_GET_ASIGLEN(), it introduces separate LTREE_GET_SIGLEN() and
> LTREE_GET_ASIGLEN() macros.

Um ... what I see after applying the patch is two redundant
definitions of LTREE_GET_ASIGLEN, and no LTREE_GET_SIGLEN.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13