On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Alexander Korotkov > <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> > > wrote: > >> So far as I can tell, there are three patches in flight here: > >> > >> * replication slot IO lwlocks > >> * ability of extensions to request tranches dynamically > >> * PGPROC > >> > >> The first one hasn't been reviewed at all, but the other two have seen a > >> bit of discussion and evolution. Is anyone doing any more reviewing? > > > > I'd like to add another one: fixed tranche id for each SLRU. > > +1 for this. The patch looks good and I will commit it if nobody objects. >
+1. Patch looks good to me as well, but I have one related question:
Is there a reason why we should not assign ReplicationOrigins a
fixed tranche id and then we might want to even get away with
LWLockRegisterTranche()?
+1. I think we should do this.
------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
