On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 1:06 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 2:35 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> > > I really appreciate a hint here.
> >
> > I think I'm to blame for most of that code originally, so I'll take
> > a look soon. Been up to my neck in other stuff recently.
>
> Do I understand correctly that enforce_generic_type_consistency() is
> called only after check_generic_type_consistency() returned true?
>
> If so, that means some of the checks are redundant. Therefore, we can
> replace ereport()'s with Assert()'s.
I got no feedback on this yet. And 14beta3 is approaching...
I'm going to write a patch fixing enforce_generic_type_consistency()
while saving its general logic (as far as I can understand it).
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
