The goal was to limit access to the schema to users who manage roles, in all likelihood to a specific group of administrators. This can be done with this solution. I have no problem with managing roles through plpgsql functions. There has been no need to create databases until now. In my solution, the schema is a data element, for flexibility.
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 08:36:21AM +0500, Дмитрий Иванов wrote: > In my solution, all users don't need direct access to the schema because > you have to use the functional API to access it. If you can manage users > with functions, you can close the schema in the same way. > Usually the function is executed with the permissions of the calling user, > which requires permissions for all affected entities. However, if you > specify the "SECURITY DEFINER" parameter at creation, the function will be > executed with the owner's permissions. The owner of the function has no > login permissions but has permissions on the affected entities. In this way > you will close the schema from the roles that have rights to the role > management functions.
Sure you can solve most problems with that. But you can't create a database (or a tablespace) from a function so this approach wouldn't cover all of OP's needs, as different approach would be needed for role and db creation.
