Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Nolan
Subject Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Date
Msg-id CAOzAqu+H5_c=NEU1zEaNON2r4P=R34kurwnu3a7Axvuet4sn9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?  (Joel Jacobson <joel@trustly.com>)
Responses Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?  (Joel Jacobson <joel@trustly.com>)
Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?  (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Why not take a simpler approach and create a zero length file in directories that should not be fiddled with by non-experts using a file name something like "DO.NOT.DELETE.THESE.FILES"? 

No, it won't prevent the incredibly stupid from doing incredibly stupid things, nothing will.
--
Mike Nolan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1