Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Maciek Sakrejda
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id CAOtHd0Dq0SWNtH8z0pu1d_hB1jMnGXJ_krxd_BHLb2Hk2BToLg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew made a good case above for avoiding LOG:

>I do think we should be wary of any name starting with "LOG", though.
>Long experience tells us that's something that confuses users when it
refers to the WAL.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Assertion failure in pgstat_assert_is_up during walsender exit