>
> I'll have to take a look. Removing *all spinning* from from page
> allocation though feels like it might be worthwhile to test (got to
> give some bonus points for being a very local change and simple to
> implement). I wonder if with more shared buffers you tend to sweep
> more buffers per allocation. (IIRC Jeff J was skeptical of that).
Replacing the spinning with TAS for buffer header sounds like a good idea.
Regards,
Atri
--
Regards,
Atri
l'apprenant
