Re: Commitfest problems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Arthur Silva
Subject Re: Commitfest problems
Date
Msg-id CAO_YK0UCf74pTsoA8vUBxNBZdcq18qQiCj84hbaU2Cnpt2hDHQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commitfest problems  (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
On 19/12/14 20:48, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-12-18 10:02:25 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
I think a lot of hackers forget exactly how tender their egos are. Now I say
this knowing that a lot of them will go, "Oh give me a break" but as someone
who employs hackers, deals with open source AND normal people :P every
single day, I can tell you without a single inch of sarcasm that petting
egos is one of the ways you get things done in the open source (and really
any male dominated) community.

To me that's a bit over the top stereotyping.


+1

Having been mentioned one or two times myself - it was an unexpected "wow - cool" rather than a grumpy/fragile "I must be noticed" thing. I think some folk have forgotten the underlying principle of the open source community - it is about freely giving - time or code etc. The "there must be something in it for me me me" meme is - well - the *other* world view.

However, doing crappy work and let's not be shy about it, there is NOTHING
fun about reviewing someone else's code needs to have incentive.

FWIW, I don't agree with this at all. Reviewing code can be quite
interesting - with the one constraint that the problem the patch solves
needs to be somewhat interesting. The latter is what I think gets many
of the more experienced reviewers - lots of the patches just solve stuff
they don't care about.


Yeah, and also it helps if the patch addresses an area that you at least know *something* about - otherwise it is really hard to review in any useful way.

Cheers

Mark



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

I'm trying to follow this thread as much as I could but I could've missed a part of it.

Merit/credits aside what would really help Postgres right now is a more streamlined/modern (the only words I could come up with) development process.

Using the mailing list for everything is alright, it works. But there is lot of tools that could be used along it: gerrit/gitlab/github/bitbucket/jira and other tools that do: pull requests, code review and bugs (or any combination of them).

That'd reduce friction for new contributors and further development. These tools are being used everywhere and I find hard to believe that PG can't benefit from any of them.

--
Arthur Silva

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alex Shulgin
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HINT: pg_hba.conf changed since last config reload
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Role Attribute Bitmask Catalog Representation