Re: How to retain lesser paths at add_path()? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kohei KaiGai
Subject Re: How to retain lesser paths at add_path()?
Date
Msg-id CAOP8fzaKP49Lr7DFoLhdDoTdzaqfA_JsdQe0=ROa+pn9Vnh+fg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How to retain lesser paths at add_path()?  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: How to retain lesser paths at add_path()?  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

The proposition I posted at 10th-Oct proposed to have a separate list to retain
lesser paths not to expand the path_list length, but here are no comments by
others at that time.
Indeed, the latest patch has not been updated yet.
Please wait for a few days. I'll refresh the patch again.

Thanks,

2020年1月11日(土) 11:01 Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder what is the status of this patch/thread. There was quite a bit
> of discussion about possible approaches, but we currently don't have any
> patch for review, AFAICS. Not sure what's the plan?
>
> So "needs review" status seems wrong, and considering we haven't seen
> any patch since August (so in the past two CFs) I propose marking it as
> returned with feedback. Any objections?
>
> FWIW I think we may well need a more elaborate logic which paths to
> keep, but I'd prefer re-adding it back to the CF when we actually have a
> new patch.
>
> regards
>
> --
> Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



--
HeteroDB, Inc / The PG-Strom Project
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@heterodb.com>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - use pg logging capabilities
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process