Re: Fix parallel vacuum buffer usage reporting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Anthonin Bonnefoy
Subject Re: Fix parallel vacuum buffer usage reporting
Date
Msg-id CAO6_Xqpt9t4Oyn9TBS9HeOupfuaH1B4xU9SYbs7k86cVK6m92w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix parallel vacuum buffer usage reporting  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Fix parallel vacuum buffer usage reporting
List pgsql-hackers
Hi, 

Thanks for the review.
 
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:07 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
As for the proposed patch, the following part should handle the temp tables too:

True, I've missed the local blocks. I've updated the patch:
- read_rate and write_rate now include local block usage
- I've added a specific output for reporting local blocks instead of combining them in the same output.

Regards,
Anthonin
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel