Re: Fix parallel vacuum buffer usage reporting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hi, thank you for your work with this subject.

While I was reviewing your code, I noticed that your patch conflicts with another patch [0] that been committed.

[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKGJkOiOCa%2Bmag4BF%2BzHo7qo%3Do9CFheB8%3Dg6uT5TUm2gkvA%40mail.gmail.com

Hi, 

Thanks for the review.

 

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:07 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:

As for the proposed patch, the following part should handle the temp tables too:

True, I've missed the local blocks. I've updated the patch:

- read_rate and write_rate now include local block usage

- I've added a specific output for reporting local blocks instead of combining them in the same output.

Regards,

Anthonin

-- 
Regards,
Alena Rybakina
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company